Well, I would say if it's done legally, and if the immigrants intend to learn the language, assimilate to the host country's culture, governing principles, etc., then it is not an invasion.
On the other hand, if the immigrants have no intention of assimilating, but on the contrary work to establish, say (to cite a random example), a theocracy whose tenets are inimical to the culture and governing principles of the host country, then yes, it IS an invasion, and countries that permit this to happen are committing suicide.
You're right, bu I was assuming above that as part of the LEGAL process, the numbers would be kept to reasonable and manageable levels.
Admittedly, considering the conflicted interests of the corrupt politicians of both parties, keeping the levels manageable might be asking too much of those scoundrels.
I've saturated FB private and secret SodaHead groups that sprung to life when Fef sold out, but I will certainly invite everyone I can think of! So glad YOU are here. When I saw YOU, CHARU, 56LADY, and others, it really sort-a felt like coming "home"!
When bands of roaming rapists stand in the way of the cops and yell, "We're from Syria, you should be nice to us." I cannot help but call it intentional.
Of course their goal is to takeover the world. CALIPHATE??? Read a Qur'an, lately? They're trying to takeover other COUNTRY'S GOVERNMENTS! What do you mean by saying, "STATE"? Sounds a little too much like politically correct mishmash!
If referring to the lexical definitions, "invasion" has many interpretations.
The origin of the word "invasion" and the verb "invade", i.e. Latin invadere = to go, come, or get into, etc. (in = in, into, etc. and vadere = to go, to walk, etc.), invasion has many different definitions, whether positive or negative, unfair or abusive, productive or wasteful.
If referring to history, military invasions and human migration occurred since very ancient times:
DAMN RIGHT it IS an INVASION. Cleverly conceaed to look like a plea for "hard to resist humanitarian aid"; especially when Pope Francis chimes in, in favor, and Obama uses the FORMER "authority" of the United States Office of the President (before he destroyed any credibility), to try and add some credence to the devilish plot. I'm no fool; of course there were many desperate refugees invading the EU, but there were also many Islamic radical fascists (many from IS), using the invasion of the EU to get "operatives" in place. Obama is trying to bring those Muslim fascists to the US under the same guise. When will Americans see Obama for the anti-Christian person, he really is? Proof? OKAY; why are Syrian Christians, ALSO facing genocide from IS (and MANY others), who would have a much higher likelihood of assimilating the American culture, practically being COMPLETELY DENIED asylum, while Syrian Muslims, of questionable repute and practically guaranteed to reject assimilation into our culture and reject our Constitution for their sharia law, being FAST TRACKED FOR ASYLUM BY THE OBAMA REGIME BY THE HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS??? There's JUST one answer; MAObama is trying to DE-CHRISTIANIZE the United States by flooding it with Muslims and illegal aliens who won't even learn English. The US has no business allowing foreign immigrants with no special work skills to invade, especially ILLEGALLY, when so many Americans are unemployed. Simple common sense and logic dictate the TRUTH!
In the case of the Muslims 'running' to Europe to get away from the violence in their country, I have reason to believe this to be an invasion. Even though their reasons for fleeing conflict may seem legit to us, the Muslims have a 'duty' to lie to the infidel to hide their true purposes when the Muslim is 'outnumbered' or feels that they are in a dangerous position socially. In this case, only the Muslims in question know for sure. However, after reading about the multiple rapes in European countries that have taken in a large number of Muslims, and seeing how the rape of an infidel woman is seen in the Muslim world view as a form of humiliating and breaking the spirit of their infidel enemies, then I have to say the invasion is on. To me the proof is in the putting. Also the significant number of religious related attacks by the Muslims on the people of Europe over 'protecting the Image of Allah' or to teach the kaffir(a conquered unbeliever) a lesson on showing respect to the ruling Muslim population and the prophet Mohammad.
Well, I would say if it's done legally, and if the immigrants intend to learn the language, assimilate to the host country's culture, governing principles, etc., then it is not an invasion.
On the other hand, if the immigrants have no intention of assimilating, but on the contrary work to establish, say (to cite a random example), a theocracy whose tenets are inimical to the culture and governing principles of the host country, then yes, it IS an invasion, and countries that permit this to happen are committing suicide.
Admittedly, considering the conflicted interests of the corrupt politicians of both parties, keeping the levels manageable might be asking too much of those scoundrels.
Hi SIMPATTYCO!
Great to see you here!
I've saturated FB private and secret SodaHead groups that sprung to life when Fef sold out, but I will certainly invite everyone I can think of! So glad YOU are here. When I saw YOU, CHARU, 56LADY, and others, it really sort-a felt like coming "home"!
Glad you're here too, Tee!
Amen !!!!
Not unless they're trying to take over the other state's government.
Of course their goal is to takeover the world. CALIPHATE??? Read a Qur'an, lately? They're trying to takeover other COUNTRY'S GOVERNMENTS! What do you mean by saying, "STATE"? Sounds a little too much like politically correct mishmash!
Yes, actually I do.
If referring to the lexical definitions, "invasion" has many interpretations.
The origin of the word "invasion" and the verb "invade", i.e. Latin invadere = to go, come, or get into, etc. (in = in, into, etc. and vadere = to go, to walk, etc.), invasion has many different definitions, whether positive or negative, unfair or abusive, productive or wasteful.
If referring to history, military invasions and human migration occurred since very ancient times:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_invasions
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_human_migration
@Tee Quake While you are right, I think she got the point I was making already.
Thank you, Gun. I am not belittling things, but there are matters which are too toxic to start to fight about.
And in this case, I would prefer to stick to linguistics, and not to the extreme violence of human history, whatever the side or belief.
In case of invasion, the problems arise with overpopulation and incompatibility of interests.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overpopulation
It doesn't have to be under arms to be an invasion.
It is an invasion if they are uninvited and illegally entering
Invasion and it's already HERE, too!
Yes it is an invasion.
DAMN RIGHT it IS an INVASION. Cleverly conceaed
to look like a plea for "hard to resist humanitarian aid"; especially when Pope Francis chimes in, in favor, and Obama uses the FORMER "authority" of the United States Office of the President (before he destroyed any credibility), to try and add some credence to the devilish plot. I'm no fool; of course there were many desperate refugees invading the EU, but there were also many Islamic radical fascists (many from IS), using the invasion of the EU to get "operatives" in place. Obama is trying to bring those Muslim fascists to the US under the same guise. When will Americans see Obama for the anti-Christian person, he really is? Proof? OKAY; why are Syrian Christians, ALSO facing genocide from IS (and MANY others), who would have a much higher likelihood of assimilating the American culture, practically being COMPLETELY DENIED asylum, while Syrian Muslims, of questionable repute and practically guaranteed to reject assimilation into our culture and reject our Constitution for their sharia law, being FAST TRACKED FOR ASYLUM BY THE OBAMA REGIME BY THE HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS??? There's JUST one answer; MAObama is trying to DE-CHRISTIANIZE the United States by flooding it with Muslims and illegal aliens who won't even learn English. The US has no business allowing foreign immigrants with no special work skills to invade, especially ILLEGALLY, when so many Americans are unemployed. Simple common sense and logic dictate the TRUTH!
In the case of the Muslims 'running' to Europe to get away from the violence in their country, I have reason to believe this to be an invasion. Even though their reasons for fleeing conflict may seem legit to us, the Muslims have a 'duty' to lie to the infidel to hide their true purposes when the Muslim is 'outnumbered' or feels that they are in a dangerous position socially. In this case, only the Muslims in question know for sure. However, after reading about the multiple rapes in European countries that have taken in a large number of Muslims, and seeing how the rape of an infidel woman is seen in the Muslim world view as a form of humiliating and breaking the spirit of their infidel enemies, then I have to say the invasion is on. To me the proof is in the putting. Also the significant number of religious related attacks by the Muslims on the people of Europe over 'protecting the Image of Allah' or to teach the kaffir(a conquered unbeliever) a lesson on showing respect to the ruling Muslim population and the prophet Mohammad.
yes