says university political scientist Helmut Norpoth.
http://www.newsday.com/opinion/my-model-shows-donald-trump-has-an-87-percent-chance-of-beating-hillary-clinton-1.12102905
Personally, I think a OUIJA Board has more credibility than any Poll when it comes to predicting who the next President is going to be.
This wasn't a poll. It was a statistical study of historical and political factors.
Of course, it might also be a false-flag article, designed to scare unenthusiastic Democrats to get out and vote.
I mean, there were also statistical studies that said Bernie would win, and look how that turned out
The most notorious Bernie prediction that I'm aware of came from Western Illinois University (which "hasn't been wrong since 1975"), which of course liberal outlets ate up.
http://www.liberalamerica.org/2015/12/05/they-havent-been-wrong-our-next-president-bernie-sanders-hillary-clinton/
Only trouble was, it wasn't a statistical study... it was a mock election, and given Sanders' popularity among students, the (wrong) outcome was not surprising.
I hope you're right. Not a big fan of Trump but he's a lot better than another Clinton. Look what NAFTA did for our country !
I somehow doubt that the author of the article really believes the odds are so in favor of Trump.
As I speculated to Cowboy above, it might be a false-flag article, designed to scare unenthusiastic Democrats to get out and vote.
At least if Trump wins by that point I'll be old enough to order a whiskey in a bar
And you won't be old enough at that point if Hillary wins...?
If Hillary wins I won't have to over dramatically drown my sorrows
⭐ Click here to see the recent version of this page ⭐