+1 vote
93 views

6 Answers

+1 vote
by

totally disagree!

+1 vote
by

I think the age should have remained at 18.

+2 votes
by

No but, taxed and should require a stamp to sell.

+1 vote
by

It's not really going to matter much. If they want cigarettes? They'll get them. I would like to see them enforce that in the military. Waste of time and money!

0 votes
by

I think I disagree.

+1 vote
by

I  know that it will not work, this had been debated in the past, if kid's under 18 can get beer, they will smoke, but that is really play  here , is the democrat campaign on  tobacco industry, and kid's under 18 21 are now, breaking the law.  when democrat claim there trying to free up court,s and jail.so what have they done here/ there going to fill up the court's again, with kid's who before now not committing a crime. now they are. and  here democrat claim that they want people to live there life and way that want? how dose narrative. work here, if over 18 and want to smoke that your right. it call freedom of choice   it odd here democrat claim , that conservative are all way telling them how to live?  , so i ask why are they , now doing the same  thing? and telling poeple  how to live?  narrative are a funny thing.

Is this page not working?

Click here to see the recent version of this page

...